Comments for Praxis Makes Perfect

Comment on Do Children Learn in Different Ways? by Nasreen

Nasreen — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:09:39 +0000

Pardon my intrusion, I’ve been reading your blog for a short time, but recently wrote a paper on Multiple Intelligences and thought I could insert my few cents.

The way I understand Gardner’s MI Theory is that everyone possesses all of the intelligences, just to differing degrees. Just because someone is an amazing artist does not mean they are terrible at sports.

How would you design online resources for a kid who is a “physical learner”?
This falls under the “bodily-kinesthetic” intelligence, so it could even include playing an online game or creating something using Photoshop. It is definitely much harder to incorporate this, but with technology like the Wii, we might get something geared toward the classroom soon.

I think you said it best with your last comment. There isn’t just one way that each student learns. All learners need to see things in different ways and technology is opening many exciting ways for doing so.

Comment on Disruptive Innovation in Education by Do Children Learn in Different Ways? « Praxis Makes Perfect

Do Children Learn in Different Ways? « Praxis Makes Perfect — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:43:59 +0000

[...] About ← Disruptive Innovation in Education [...]

Comment on A Concrete Example of a Disruptive Technology by Janice Medina

Janice Medina — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:07:57 +0000

My children are students enrolled in the Wisconsin Virtual Academy (WIVA). This is our 4th year of enrollment.
You asked: >>How do public funds get transferred to the cyber school? Many districts get angry when they lose student funds for their kids who enroll in an online school. <<
I can give you exact numbers for Wisconsin for the school year 2006-07 (current year are not available).
The funding level in 06-07 was $9,149 per student.
The school district in which we live (sending district) keeps $3,304 per student that enrolls in another district. The receiving district gets the remaining $5,845.
So, I’d say the sending district shouldn’t get too angry; they get to keep $6,608 ($3,304 x 2) without providing services or materials to my two children!
Whereas, the receiving district has to purchase curriculum, computers and Internet access for each student, pay teachers, administrators and support staff, administer federally mandated testing, and create community through in-person workshops, outings, math club, literature circles, field trips, science fairs, etc.
Thanks.

Comment on What is the role of digital media in school? by Mechelle De Craene

Mechelle De Craene — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:12:18 +0000

Hi June,

Thank you for the references. I’ll check them out. I appreciate them. Have a wonderful new year!

Best Wishes,
Mechelle : )

Comment on What is the role of digital media in school? by June

June — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:57:18 +0000

Mechelle, thanks for the comment.

I’ve updated the post with some articles you might find interesting.

Comment on What is the role of digital media in school? by Mechelle De Craene

Mechelle De Craene — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:18:55 +0000

Hi June,

Re: “What we know: Digital media does not improve (or negatively impact) students’ learning. In fact most good studies show no significant differences in student learning from using media or traditional classrooms.”

Can you please cite your references? And how do you define good?

Also, since you were a teacher, can you please share a little more about your classroom experiences with regard to digital media and learning?

Thank you in advance.

Mechelle

Comment on Open Source Curriculum by Randy

Randy — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:50:11 +0000

Hi June! Thanks for sharing. Our primary teachers found this very useful.

Comment on Towards a General/Robust Definition of Educational “Technology” by Gnoletcom

Gnoletcom — Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:15:48 +0000

Please join for discussions on topics about The Virtual Reality.
Technology development of The Virtual Reality and its perspectives.
Gnolet.com

Comment on EdTech Talk by synapsesensations

synapsesensations — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:44:19 +0000

Hi June,
You make interesting and useful points about how to consider the content of any given talk.

On point #6 I take a little different approach from yours. I accept that there simply are folks who are wired differently, and therefore there are folks for whom math is not going to be enjoyable no matter how much/hard/long/intently they apply themselves to the task.

Most math classes are taught along very traditional lines that do little, if anything, to bring in those who are wired differently, and I disagree with your contention that “but I think with time, persistent practice, and effort she would”.

Cheers,
Laurie

Comment on EdTech Talk by Alex Ragone

Alex Ragone — Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:28:47 +0000

Hey June,

Thanks again for being on our show. I posted the show this afternoon here: http://www.edtechtalk.com/21st_Century_Learning_35

Great points above — As for #6, since I work in an all boys school, I feel that it’s important to look at physical learning — sometimes jumping around when I learn is ok. I think for teachers, we have to know our students and how they learn, and help them learn the best way they can. Very interesting points about Multiple intelligences.

I look forward to watching your learning continue.

Cheers,

- Alex